SpaceX, NASA Managers Discuss Vehicle Mishap Following CRS‑7 Launch
NASA,SpaceX (Spacecraft Manufacturer),Kennedy Space Center (Spaceport),KSC,mishap
During a post-launch press conference on June 28, mangers from SpaceX and NASA discuss the mishap following the liftoff of the SpaceX CRS‑7 mission from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The mission was to deliver supplies, hardware and other important cargo to the International Space Station. SpaceX is leading the investigation of the cause of the issue.
Anyone who spots debris in the water or sees it washed up anywhere along the shore should report it by calling 866–392-0035 or emailing recovery@spaceX.com or contacting your nearest local law enforcement official.
#SpaceX #NASA #Managers #Discuss #Vehicle #Mishap #CRS7 #Launch
It was shot down by nasa or the goverment or alliens. They dont want that we get to space to know whats up there. They want to shut elon musk down. Now I think about it its the goverment.
Audio is weak. Im having problems healing voices with headphones.
Remeber that in EU we have a stupid European Volume Limit.
Please boost the audio Volume in future videos.
Otherwise great public outreach.
Love to get to listen in and learn
But yet you flew to the moon?ha what a joke!
And yet you flew to the moon? Yeah right!
Mr.President.….….….….….It looks a little off.
Mr.President.….….….…..it looks a little off.
You should buy it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If ULA or some other party had sabotaged the spacecraft with a laser weapon, would it be a detectable event given the available data?
I feel sorry for mr. Mask.
Just admit it Nasa you never flew to the moon
Still, even though this is the first SpaceX, it’s an embarrassment worldwide. It makes us look like we can’t do what was done in this country 55 years ago. Stop making excuses for these people and coddling them. If they’d done adequate testing and research this most likely wouldn’t have happened.
well if you need to get into space you need to know what your doing, call the Russians.
THE EXPLOSION LEFT NOTHING!
HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?!
Skip the duct tape. Tear down; re-design; rebuild: a vehicle system as reliant as the Ariane 5, Atlas or Delta rocket systems. And congratulations to Space‑X and all of the hard working executives and engineers for being bold enough to endure the failures that pave the way to ultimate success and reliability.
That Gwynne Shotwell is a knockout. She probably intimidates all these ”men’ at SpaceX. lol
These people at NASA look so overwhelmingly happy and vibrant
Get ready for the usual euphemisms and 55 minutes of non-information in general. Proudly preseented by Shekelstein, Shekelberg, Shekelblatt and some unimportant person.
Don’t fly in JUNE !!!!!!
Struggling to keep a straight face when “communicating” hocus-pocus stories for grown-up-kids perhaps justifies the fat paycheck. Does it really take a rocket scientist to figure-out that NASA has been and still is the most successful misappropriation of funds ever ti have been invented? I always knew americans were stupid but things are going out of hand and beyond common sense. How long are you going to tolerate these crooks to live fatcat lives out of your hard-earned money? Geez!
Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly; it’s a feature…
Just curious, are there a bunch of gigantic unknown flying objects (ships) parked behind the moon?
The best part is that nothing irreplacable was lost, namely human life.
Rockets can be rebuilt. Humans, not yet for now.
The guy sitting at the desk seems to keep referring to equipment or supplies as “logistics”. Is this a common usage amongst space engineers or something?
Update please! Have they discovered the cause (details) of the failure?
I guess military contracts now will solely go to Lockheed/Boeing …:-)) — for a long, long time :-))
Can we call it a snafu?
NASA.……Explain how bubbles are formed in space.…
Seeing his eyes hurt me 🙁
It’s part of the work and learning curvature of engineers. Do it again, and again and better until get the success and glory. Best regards!
Meh, SpaceX made rocket launching so cheap they can have every second one explode and it will still be more profitable than paying Soyuz taxi. You can’t innovate without mistakes.
I’m sure there will be many more mishaps so get used to it.
Pogo oscillation is a prime candidate for this upper stage failure. Pogo oscillation is the oscillation of thrust caused by and feeding back into oscillating pressure in the fuel and oxidizer lines that feed the (first stage) rocket engine. Buffeting around MaxQ (when the air resistance that climbs with speed and falls with air density hits the maximum) is another one. Cryogenic fluids sloshing caused by first stage pogo, followed by manifold rupture or cryotank rupture in the upper stage is my best bet.
A year is nothing in evolution, Crack on, don’t put all your eggs…, chin up chaps!
“Mitch Ola 1 week ago
how much did this pollute the atmosphere.. ? Is there a fine? Can I sue?”
You mentioned “atmosphere,” so if you are speaking about CO2 emissions, a Falcon 9 holds a similar amount of fuel as a 747 jumbo jet. The fuel and combustion method is somewhat different, but there have been 1500 747’s manufactured, and most are still in service. Most commercial jets fly multiple times per day in order to be cost effective. This does not include the tens of thousands of other large commercial passenger or cargo planes in daily service. The Falcon 9 ranged from 2 launched to 6 launches per year since 2010. A rough ratio of emissions from the fuel of Falcon 9 at 6 launches per year compared to 1500 747’s flying daily for 1 year is 0.0011%.
Although you mentioned “atmosphere,” if you are talking about debris from the explosion, Falcon 9 has 1 unintended “crash,” over water, at launch over a period of 5 years. Commercial jets and turboprops, depending on which list you use, have had an average of 17 crashes, or large parts such as engines falling over land, over a period of the last 5 years. A ratio for Falcon 9 to commercial flight crashes or unintended parts separation in the last 5 years is 1.2%.
Commercial airlines are not sued or fined over concerns of pollution from accidents. They are sued or fined for negligence in maintenance or operator training, or for slow response to investigation or support of victim families. SpaceX lives under the same overall carbon regulation system as the rest of the US, and SpaceX purchases carbon credits from other companies.
Keep using the recycled Russian boosters you morons!
the rocket hit the sky dome ??
make armored cockpit ?
Space X’s record is much better than mine.
If the only knew how many Kerbals I have killed.
How can one country spend
so much and see so little in
return. Will, I think I’m looking
at a contributing factor. An
abundance of office personal
with mostly political functions. We can’t afford
nonsense. And space is as
chuckle headed as you will
find.
❤❤