Watch Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg testify before Congress

The real rea­son behind this meet­ing is because they did­n’t want Face­book stocks to drop too much… lol

tes­ti­fy for mr robot sea­son 4 😀

The intro back­ground music was THE best.

IT IS A JOKE

Con­gress clear­ly does not under­stand the dig­i­tal age. What an embar­rass­ment to the U.S.

If you are not pay­ing for a prod­uct, you are the prod­uct. It’s real­ly that sim­ple. Gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­tion of the inter­net and social media has been a grow­ing con­cern for those of us who still believe in the free­dom of speech. Using AI (arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence) to tar­get and fil­ter “hate speech” means that cer­tain trig­ger words like guns, vio­lence, rape, any­thing neg­a­tive about the LGBTQ com­mu­ni­ty or racism, Muslim/Islam, and snowflakes will be auto­mat­i­cal­ly fil­tered and delet­ed. After four hours, I can’t remem­ber which Sen­a­tor asked Zucker­berg “who decides what is or is not hate speech?” He avoid­ed answer­ing the ques­tion, and that is a prob­lem. I don’t care if my opin­ion hurts some­one’s feel­ings or isn’t PC. I do care, very strong­ly, about my right to express my opin­ion with­out cen­sor. Pay close atten­tion to the ones push­ing for more gov­ern­ment over­sight and reg­u­la­tion of the inter­net and social media, instead of focus­ing on the data min­ing, col­lec­tion and sale of your per­son­al infor­ma­tion. This is the per­fect excuse for the Fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to make yet anoth­er attempt to seize con­trol of the inter­net, under the guise of “pro­tect­ing Amer­i­cans from inter­fer­ence by oth­er coun­tries.” Blam­ing anoth­er coun­try or com­pa­ny for attempt­ing to influ­ence our opin­ion is igno­rant excuse, and the prac­tice isn’t lim­it­ed to pol­i­tics. How many peo­ple are influ­enced by ads from for­eign car com­pa­nies like Hon­da or Toy­ota? Like to drink Bud­weis­er beer? Guess what, Anheuser-Busch is Amer­i­ca’s top sell­ing beer, with numer­ous ads, and they are a Brazil­ian-Bel­gian com­pa­ny. Puri­na pet food is now owned by a Swiss com­pa­ny called Nes­tle. Yes, that’s right…the same com­pa­ny that give us the Nes­tle Crunch bar isn’t Amer­i­can. Crav­ing a Slurpee or Big Gulp in the sum­mer, or need to just grab a gal­lon of milk on the way home from work? Most of us just hit 7‑Eleven instead of the gro­cery store because it is quick, con­ve­nient, and they are every­where. They are also owned by a Japan­ese com­pa­ny. Instead of blam­ing a coun­try or a com­pa­ny for run­ning ads that influ­ence your opin­ion, you should rethink your method of research­ing polit­i­cal can­di­dates. The Wash­ing­ton Post ran an arti­cle on Novem­ber 19, 2017 about the Trump-Rus­sia col­lu­sion, and found that Rus­sia also donat­ed very gen­er­ous­ly to the Clin­ton Foun­da­tion, Bill Clin­ton him­self for speak­ing engage­ments in Rus­sia, and to Tony Podes­ta who is the Demo­c­ra­t­ic lob­by­ist and broth­er of John Podesta…the chair­man of Hilary Clin­ton’s cam­paign. Just fol­low the Russ­ian money…it’s the worst kept secret in Wash­ing­ton.
I’d also love to know exact­ly how many peo­ple were tru­ly shocked that Face­book, along with Google and YouTube, has been col­lect­ing and sell­ing your per­son­al infor­ma­tion. If you were tru­ly shocked, out­raged, and sur­prised that a free social media web­site has been using you (the prod­uct) to pay the bills for their mas­sive glob­al com­pa­ny, you are either too young to under­stand basic eco­nom­ics or you are igno­rant. Why are we here again?? Oh yeah, the Face­book data breach. How does a man who built a glob­al social media empire from his col­lege dorm room end up sit­ting in front of a Sen­ate hear­ing? He is a scape­goat for the Demo­c­ra­t­ic par­ty and Hilary Clin­ton’s failed cam­paign. Zucker­berg repeat­ed­ly states that adding addi­tion­al AI fil­ters will help pre­vent inci­dents like this data col­lec­tion deba­cle from hap­pen­ing in the future. Are we sup­posed to believe a high­ly expe­ri­enced coder with only 25,000 employ­ees (in a glob­al cor­po­ra­tion) has­n’t already been using mas­sive amounts of AI to run Face­book? I don’t think he has out­right lied in his respons­es, but he has deflect­ed, repeat­ing the same phras­es many times, and does­n’t have any of the sta­tis­ti­cal infor­ma­tion with him. Who does that?? The answer…someone who isn’t real­ly wor­ried about fac­ing any legal ram­i­fi­ca­tions. The pro­tect­ed scapegoat…

Poor Zucc

Mark did lie. When you deac­ti­vate an account you can always reac­tive it by just log­ging back on. So if data is delet­ed when you deac­ti­vate it you shouldn’t be able to see your old data when you reactive. 🤔

FIVE HOURS LONG 😮 OMG

If peo­ple want to use face­book then they accept the con­di­tons, if they care so much about pri­va­cy don’t use facebook.

What about the fact that you can just copy some­thing off of face­book and share it with­out any repro­cu­sions. Pic­tures lose their IP rights when they are copied from face­book. I remem­ber mak­ing a t‑shirt from an online com­pa­ny that prints pic­tures, they called me to con­firm that I had the right autho­riza­tion to use the pic­ture for the pur­pose of print­ing on this shirt. I only told them that I had acquired the pic­ture from face­book. The per­son who called said she need­ed to check on some­thing and then they print­ed the shirt. Good to know for any legal stuff, if you need free stuff take it from facebook.

chor nahi hai Facebook

I watched it already