Shadow banning explained: Why Trump’s blasting Twitter | Bridget Breaks It Down

Read more about Twit­ter shad­ow ban­ning on CNET: https://www.cnet.com/news/shadow-banning-what-it-is-and-what-its-not/

It’s always some dumb chick try­ing to audi­tion for the Dai­ly Show.

hahaa­ha­hah­haaa~! How do you like me now ?????

Wow, that is all I can say. She is liv­ing on the moon if she thinks right wing con­ser­v­a­tives are not being tar­get­ed by shad­ow ban­ning. The algo­rithms are left-wing ori­ent­ed. just try typ­ing in Tul­si Gab­bard. and by the way, right-wing voic­es are silenced because the left does not agree with the first amend­ment. (or the sec­ond) or the third.…

How’s the crow taste? Your fake news!

This lying woman is a great exam­ple of cult behav­ior. Ignore or dis­tort all incon­ve­nient info, and remem­ber to remind the plebes that they have no right to free speech and are con­spir­a­cy theorist.

Wow, this did not age well, CNET.

Aged like a Fine milk, Twit­ter are shadowbanning.

After the release of “Twit­ter files”, I real­ized that your chan­nel is trash.

Brid­get Carey “Senior Edi­tor”?! Wow. I hope as a senior edi­tor that you have the morals and ethics to admit that you were com­plete­ly wrong and apologize.

Soon­er or lat­ter you’ll be exposed n truth will pre­vail on judg­ment day. You lose. It’s com­ing. All liars burn in the lake of fire

Oh boy this did not age well at all, did it.

It doesn’t hap­pen to Repub­li­cans on Twit­ter but any com­mon cit­i­zen who has a con­tro­ver­sial thought or oppos­ing idea I get a shad­ow ban

Does YouTube shad­ow banning?

Sure CNET … So Elon Musk Can Do What­ev­er He Wants Now .… Right?

This video did not age well.….. Thank­ful­ly now we know that Twit­ter actu­al­ly was shad­ow ban­ning repub­li­cans and conservatives

It seems that Brid­get has disappeared

🤔 just because you say it’s not real…doesn’t make it true.

4 year old lie..

Fast for­ward to 2023 now you fkers com­plain­ing the same thing ain’t?

Social net­works that need oth­er peo­ple’s mon­ey to main­tain their plat­form
Do not get to ban who­ev­er they want. now- if they ful­ly fund the net­work them­selves then they can ban who­ev­er they want.
How­ev­er, if you’re watch­ing ads then you are fund­ing the plat­form that you are speak­ing on.… and it is ille­gal to use peo­ple’s mon­ey, and time against them.
It can even fall under the guise of fraud­u­lent.
The social plat­forms would not exist with­out the Col­lec­tive fund­ing of every­body else’s data plans, and the view­ing of advertisements.

I have a feel­ing she is a CNN fan😅

Doo­de, my old­er YouTube account was shad­ow­banned, I couldn’t com­ment “end­less load­ing screen”.
The com­ments that man­aged to “post” were nev­er post­ed. and MANY of my old com­ments were delet­ed.
I don’t believe I’ve said any­thing vul­gar or over the top, but I’m pret­ty damned sure they shad­ow banned me ITS A THING.