Project Stream compared to a console
CNET,CNETTV,project stream,Assassin’s Creed,Odyssey,chrome browser,video games,video gaming,streaming video games,google,ubisoft,pc gaming,streaming setup,streamer,ubisoft games,stream project,how to stream video games,project stream vs console,PS4,Xbox One,OnLive,Nvidia GeForce Now,PlayStation Now,Project xCloud,project stream sign up,project stream price,project stream launch,project stream details,project stream review,project stream comparison
We pit Google and Ubisoft’s Project Stream gaming service against an Xbox One to see how well it can play Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey on a Chrome browser.
Read Google Project Stream: Beta sign-ups, how to play and more —
Subscribe to CNET:
CNET playlists:
Download the new CNET app:
Like us on Facebook:
Follow us on Twitter:
Follow us on Instagram:
#ProjectStream #Google #Ubisoft
#Project #Stream #compared #console
What do you guys think? Will you try Project Stream? Read more about Google Project Stream: Beta sign-ups, how to play and more — https://cnet.co/2NQMQT0
Leaving performance aside. This convenience will create other problems. If this becomes mainstream, I can see publishers being in control of you gaming experience at all times. And then capitalism comes into play. Taking away hardware is not cool at all.
If anyone can pull this off it’s Google
Im selling replay buttons 1 like= 1 replay button
0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00
There is no 5.1 surround sound on browser streaming.
Is there a reason you couldn’t put fps on the screen? This video is useless.
Google is probably the only company that can make this happen
Whatever they do console will still remain flagship.
I think this will be like Netflix, you don’t own the games but you can play any of them at any time.
I can played it yesterday and it was too good to play on Chromebook
Do people not know about gforce, looking at the comments and it seems no one knows about gforce now. Well gforce now uses and TeslaP40 for every 4 people playing, it doesn’t require much internet and it can run games like this at 100–200fps.
I’m playing on Gig cable and it’s almost perfect. No fps drops ever. Maybe about a minute or two of derezzing total. I’ve got about 25 hours into it. Also switched to a midrange Chromebook with bt enabled ps4 controller at 1080p last night and it plays just as well. Amazing.
i just uploaded raw gameplay on my channel ffs
…google realizes that the US has the worst internet, right?
I am from Macedonia and i wait for it<D
good by xbox and playstation you two dumb asses was fighting a fight that no one even cares about “4k RESOLUTION” now days gamers are on the go and nintendo managed to use that to there advantage now google took note
You get lag or delay on console anyway when you play console online services which you need for multiplayer
Geforce now is much better
Why am I just now getting this as a recommendation?
I have a feeling Project Stream will do to Nintendo Switch what PlayStation 2 did to Dreamcast.
I hope it will be a Netflix like service with no individual game purchasing.
You can’t tell in this video but you easily can tell the difference from playing on a native gaming console. In the end it’s a video feed, and you can tell. There’s just not the crispness you’d get playing natively. However, the tech is still great and seems super promising.
I’d still rather pay for this than buy a console.
You’re comparing the two while I’m here playing game on the lowest settings, lowest resolution, and half resolution scale on my shitty PC
should have compared with PC. common knowledge console quality sucks
Only if Google Fiber was everywhere it would be great I bet
Does this mean that if you’re traveling you can pick up your game where you left off at home on your console & then resume with all that progress when you get back home? And if you already paid for the game does that same license transfer over to this service? Or do you have to buy the game separately with Google? Lots of questions.
good for ppl with potato pc
Project Stream and Xbox one win.