Ancient Aliens: Lost Race of Biblical Giants Uncovered (Season 16) | History

Watch all new episodes of Ancient Aliens, Fri­days at 9/8c, and stay up to date on all of your favorite His­to­ry Chan­nel shows at http://history.com/schedule.

All non­sense. Aliens, good and bad, are here for one rea­son. To wit­ness the arrival of some­thing greater than them. The father, the son, and the holy spirit.

Giants are not a cre­ation, no more than a giant mule is a cre­ation, but a mule is a prod­uct of the hybreed­ing of a horse and a don­key, which pro­duced a giant mule.

So too a giant is not a cre­ation but a hybrid prod­uct of two beings (the sons of God and daugh­ters of men — Gen­e­sis 6). That proves that Adam was not a giant because he was the son of God (Luke 3:38). The sons of God in Gen­e­sis 6 were not giants, nei­ther was Adam, the son of God.

And the the­o­ry that the sons of God were angels is false. Hebrews 1:5 said that God nev­er called any angel his son. So, no angel is a son of God. There­fore the sons of God in Gen­e­sis 6 were not angels, no more than Adam, the son of God was an angel.

Aliens are the fall­en angels and demons. Don’t be fooled by men with so called degrees, that tell you it’s the oth­er way around.

The Bible had laws (in the Old Tes­ta­ment at least) against race mix­ing of human races. Not angel­ic races. The Book of Enoch was not writ­ten by Enoch. Its a fake. An attempt at twist­ing Bible laws against mak­ing human hybrids into laws against angel — human hybrids. The idea is pre­pos­ter­ous. This same Book of Enoch talks about 450 foot tall giants, etc, etc. Its laugh­able. The Bible’s giant were just reg­u­lar giants as we see today. Or at biggest maybe twice as tall at most. This is what we see in the fos­sil record. This is what the DNA in the fos­sils tells us. No angel DNA. Noth­ing of the sort. Giants in Gen­e­sis is a mis­trans­la­tion and should read bul­ly or tyrant (Nephilim). Giants in Hebrew is Rephaim, not Nephilim (in Genesis).

Extrater­res­tri­als?! Why is every­thing extrater­res­tri­al with these “His­to­ry Chan­nel” goons?

They did­n’t cre­ate us, God cre­at­ed us & we’re descen­dants from adam & eve

It makes sense, how­ev­er, could you imag­ine the amount resources need­ed to feed a pop­u­la­tion of giants. Out of neces­si­ty, the human pop­u­la­tion had to be reduced in size.

I mean how did the Egyp­tians build the pyra­mids. Do yk how big and heavy each stone is

I do believe they are still there under the sea, those who sur­vive the flood… near the “acores” (Tri­an­gle of bermudes) they pre­pare the Apocalypse ^^

Giants and aliens do not fit the accept­ed the­o­ries , so any evi­dence will always be suppressed.

Not Extrater­res­tri­al Fall­en Angels. They’ve always been here.

Inter­est­ing

This com­ment sec­tion makes me wish i could throw the whole human race out of a win­dow.
How many idiots can there be?

Adam was not a giant.

The ads on these videos of Joe Rogan AI try­ing to scam peo­ple is wild

Gigant is Angels Deity Fallen

Put a chimp next to Shaq… & it’s obvi­ous to me at lease that some­thing has hap­pened to our DNA to cre­ate mas­sive humans. Why? Why do we need to be so big. We have no preda­tors apart from each oth­er I guess

The NBA is proof giants exists

Around the 40-sec­ond mark of this video, the man says, “We have to look at these old myths.” By this quote alone, we can iden­ti­fy that this video sup­ports pseudoar­chae­ol­o­gy and not real archae­ol­o­gy. By ref­er­enc­ing myths instead of cold, hard facts or evi­dence, we know that the claims being made in this video have no real evi­dence to back them up and are all spec­u­la­tions. Then, around the 1‑minute mark, the nar­ra­tor asks, “Is it pos­si­ble that as geneti­cists con­tin­ue to decode the human genome, they will find that among our var­i­ous hominid ances­tors is a miss­ing link to enor­mous beings from anoth­er world?” This ques­tion goes to show that we do not pos­sess any evi­dence thus far to sup­port these claims and spec­u­la­tions, so we must address the claim of there being a “lost race of bib­li­cal giants” as being unanswered/as being pseudoar­chae­ol­o­gy. Again, around the 1:20 mark, we hear the man in the frame say­ing, “There is the poten­tial chance that we could find evi­dence.” By admit­ting that there is no evi­dence at this time to sup­port this video’s claim of there being a lost race of bib­li­cal giants, we need to acknowl­edge that this is not real archae­ol­o­gy. The video then goes on to say that ancient astro­naut the­o­rists believe that we have not yet found DNA con­nect­ing us humans back to the “bib­li­cal giants,” but we will soon. Again, this is spec­u­la­tion and not evi­dence. Towards the mid­dle of this video, it ref­er­ences that the Bible explains that the first man, Adam, was of a dif­fer­ent stature than humans are today. It is impor­tant to remem­ber that the Bible is known for using sym­bol­ism and is not always meant to be tak­en lit­er­al­ly. At the 3:45 mark, the man in the frame again ref­er­ences mythol­o­gy and states that we are miss­ing the bones of these giants. He then goes on to explain that from time to time, anthro­pol­o­gists have found large bones, but that these bones were then con­tra­dict­ed by oth­er anthro­pol­o­gists. Again, this gives no evi­dence to sup­port the claim of there being a lost race of bib­li­cal giants, even though he then false­ly states, “But def­i­nite­ly giants did exist in the past.” It is impor­tant to also recall that the nar­ra­tor even spec­u­lates at the end that we might find evi­dence in the future to sup­port these claims, which proves that at this time we have none. In order for some­thing to be rec­og­nized as real sci­ence, it must be testable, ver­i­fi­able, and fal­si­fi­able. It must also fol­low the process of the sci­en­tif­ic method. Through­out the video, we are not pro­vid­ed with any tes­ti­fi­able or ver­i­fi­able evi­dence, and there­fore noth­ing can be tak­en away from this video.

This is for a school assignment 

The video relies heav­i­ly on ancient texts and myths, such as the Bible, but can we use the Bible as proof to sup­port its claims of the exis­tence of a lost race of bib­li­cal giants and their pur­port­ed con­nec­tion to ancient aliens? Can we use Home­r’s The Odyssey as proof as evi­dence? More­over, it can fail to pro­vide actu­al sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence or data. Also, in order to sup­port its pre­con­ceived the­sis of extrater­res­tri­al inter­fer­ence in human his­to­ry, the film selec­tive­ly inter­prets anom­alous arti­facts and archae­o­log­i­cal finds. It selec­tive­ly uses facts, dis­re­gard­ing oth­er the­o­ries based on sci­en­tif­ic research and archae­o­log­i­cal tech­niques. Being able to find the skulls and bones of these giants should be proof enough, right? But in mod­ern times, human beings taller than sev­en feet have been shown to be a cause of a genet­ic con­fu­sion such as thy­roid issues. So per­haps our ances­tors just had a pre­dis­po­si­tion for the genet­ic mark­er. Because height is genet­ic, pos­si­bly it could just be that they were taller, but this biased approach encour­ages spec­u­la­tive think­ing and dis­torts the gen­uine nature of the archae­o­log­i­cal record. Also, rather than fol­low­ing the rules of log­ic and sci­en­tif­ic inves­ti­ga­tion of humans just being taller, the video engages in spec­u­la­tive sup­po­si­tion. It builds com­plex the­o­ries regard­ing the ori­gins and actions of ancient aliens and bib­li­cal giants from con­fus­ing myths and sto­ries. Is the Bible myth, or is it hard fact that we should have evi­dence on? These hypothe­ses remain the­o­ret­i­cal and unsup­port­ed in the absence of empir­i­cal con­fir­ma­tion or thor­ough inves­ti­ga­tion. Now, as a Chris­t­ian, this is a hard truth we must face about the Bible that it has been trans­lat­ed so many times over, maybe some things aren’t what they seem, even a skeleton.