Is YouTube liable for recommending videos that may have helped ISIS recruit members? #shorts
supreme court,section 230,scotus,us supreme court,supreme court live,supreme court justices,gonzalez v google,gonzalez v google summary,gonzalez v google explained,gonzalez,google,tech,tech news,the verge,the vergecast,vergecast
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Gonzalez v. Google, a case over whether YouTube’s recommendation algorithms should be granted protection under Section 230.
Subscribe:
Like The Verge on Facebook:
Follow on Twitter:
Follow on Instagram:
The Vergecast Podcast:
Decoder with Nilay Patel:
More about our podcasts:
Read More:
Community guidelines:
Wallpapers from The Verge:
#YouTube #liable #recommending #videos #helped #ISIS #recruit #members #shorts
You can listen to the full episode here: https://youtu.be/tBBW9Df0SPU
Let me get this straight. YouTube a private company what folks can use and then users feel they can do whatever they want to a platform they don’t truly own.
too political
As if the censorship wasn’t bad enough already. If we make them liable, all the censorship will be run by the government. And that’s going to be far worse. That’s why I’m afraid this will pass. Because the government wants to be able to control everything that’s allowed to be online.
It begins
YouTube doesn’t need an algorithm suggesting content and like other social media sites, algorithms don’t have the interests of the platforms users at heart. They are designed to recommend content that keeps you watching and bringing in advertising dollars and traps people in bubbles of ever more increasing polarizing content on the left and the right. Algorithms are negatively impacting the real world by increasing polarization.
This clip makes zero sense to someone that doesn’t care to follow politics